we build in both — and sometimes in neither
Both are excellent. They're just excellent at different jobs.
Choose Framer when…
- the site is marketing-led: startup site, launch page, portfolio
- motion matters — Framer's animation feel is the best in the builder class
- you want design-to-live fast, with a light CMS for a blog or projects
Choose Webflow when…
- content is structured and plentiful — many collections, filters, references
- a marketing team will publish weekly and needs a real editor workflow
- you need finer control of markup and SEO details across hundreds of pages
Choose hand-coded when…
- the site is small and rarely changes — code is faster and has no subscription
- you need something builders can't express: custom configurators, apps, special interactions
- total cost of ownership matters — our hand-coded sites run on ~zero hosting
The honest summary
Framer wins feel-per-hour. Webflow wins structure at scale. Code wins control and running costs. We work in all three, so the recommendation follows your case, not our convenience — see Framer websites, Webflow builds and custom web design, or just describe your project and we'll tell you which we'd pick and why, in writing.